Exploring the Issue of Historical Knowledge Production Regarding the Caucasus Periphery of the Russian Empire (Based on the Research Practices of A. P. Berge)
pdf (Русский)

Abstract views: 121
Galleys Downloads: 75

Keywords

Russian Empire
Caucasus
Historical Caucasus studies
Orientalism
Historiography
Archeography
Historical narrative
Caucasus acquisition by Russia
Caucasus War
A. P. Berge

How to Cite

1. Kolosovskaya T. Exploring the Issue of Historical Knowledge Production Regarding the Caucasus Periphery of the Russian Empire (Based on the Research Practices of A. P. Berge) // Journal of Frontier Studies. 2023. № 4 (8). C. 30-47.

Abstract

This article conducts an analysis of the activities of the Russian Caucasus scholar A. P. Berge (1828‑1886) with the aim of investigating the process of shaping historical knowledge about the Caucasian periphery of the Russian Empire during the late imperial period. In the public consciousness of that time, the Caucasus was firmly associated with the “East,” allowing for the identification of certain aspects of the impact of the phenomenon of orientalism on the Russian soil. Based on discussions within the academic community regarding orientalism as a colonial discourse, the author, using the specific example of the researcher, demonstrates the influence of state power on the activities of scholars.

A. P. Berge's research practices were adjusted in accordance with the demands of his time, and their outcomes aligned with the spirit of the era. Arriving in the Caucasus as a scholar of the East, with the intention of studying the local culture, he was compelled by political authority to reconsider his scholarly interests and engage in the process of shaping historical knowledge aimed at solving practical challenges faced by the local administration.

Berge, a talented researcher and organizer of Caucasian history studies, recognized the significant role of science in the cultural integration of the Caucasian periphery of the Russian Empire and conscientiously fulfilled the tasks assigned to him by the authorities. His approach to the history of the Caucasus joining Russia was not idealized, and he maintained a pragmatic stance towards the unfolding events. It is noteworthy to highlight his positive contribution to the formation of the source base of Caucasian studies, as well as his genuine interest and sympathy for the region, alongside with the absence of overt imperialistic ambitions. A prevailing theme in his works is the notion of Russia's civilizing mission in the Caucasus, and the scholarly projects he pursued contributed to establishing the foundation for constructing a shared history, aiming at the internal consolidation of the Caucasian territories and their representation as an integral part of the Russian Empire.

https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v8i4.504
pdf (Русский)

References

Alaev, L. B. (2016). Orientalism and Orientalism: Why Edward Said’s Book Did Not Succeed in Russia? In Orientalism vs. Orientalistics. Collection of Articles. (pp. 16–26). Sadra. (In Russian).

Aliyeva, A. I. (2021). Adolph Petrovich Berge – Researcher of the Peoples of the Caucasus. Traditional Culture, 22(4), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.26158/TK.2021.22.4.012 (In Russian).

Berge, A. P. (1859). Chechnya and the Chechens. Typography of the Chief Administration of the Viceroy of the Caucasus. (In Russian).

Berge, A. P. (1862). Brief Overview of the Journey to Dagestan. Caucasus, 3, 5–6. (In Russian).

Berge, A. P. (1866a). Preface. In Acts Collected by the Caucasian Archaeographic Commission: Vol. 1. (p. III–X). Typography of the Chief Administration of the Viceroy of the Caucasus. (In Russian).

Berge, A. P. (1866b). Tiflis Public Library. Caucasus, 28(2–3). (In Russian).

Berge, A. P. (1872). The Death of A.S. Griboedov, 1829. Study Based on Genuine Unpublished Documents. Russian Antiquity, 6(8), 163–207. (In Russian).

Berge, A. P. (1877). Defense of the Mikhailovsky Fortress in the Caucasus. March 22, 1840. Russian Antiquity, 19(5), 275–286. (In Russian).

Berge, A. P. (1880). The Annexation of Georgia to Russia, 1799–1831. Russian Antiquity, 28(5–8), 1–177. (In Russian).

Berge, A. P. (1882). The Expulsion of the Highlanders from the Caucasus. Historical Sketch. Russian Antiquity, 33(1–2), 161–363. (In Russian).

Berge, A. P. (1883). Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus. In Picturesque Russia: Vol. IX (pp. 69–92). Typography of M. O. Volfa. (In Russian).

Druzhinin, A. V. (1860). Chechnya and the Chechens. A Review of A.P. Berge’s Work. Library for Reading, 160(7), 9–11. (In Russian).

Gorodetsky, M. B. (1912). Adolph Petrovich Berge. In Literary and Public Figures of the North Caucasus. Biobibliographical Essays (pp. 369–373). Typography of the Kuban Regional Administration. (In Russian).

Jersild, A. L. (2002). Orientalism and Empire: North Caucasus Muslim Peoples and the Georgian Frontier, 1845 – 1917. Itaca. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773569966

Kolosov, L. N. (1987). A.P. Berge: Materials for a Scholarly Biography. In History and Historians: Historiographic Yearbook (pp. 213–225). Nauka. (In Russian).

Kolosovskaya, T. A., & Tkachenko, D. S. (2020). Imperial Memory Policy in the Caucasus: Mechanisms of Constructing Mass Historical Consciousness (19th – Early 20th Century). New Historical Bulletin, 2, 131–154. (In Russian).

Kosven, M. O. (1955). Materials on the History of Ethnographic Studies of the Caucasus in Russian Science. In Caucasian Ethnographic Collection (Vol. 1, pp. 368–369). Nauka. (In Russian).

Maksimchik, A. N., & Manyashev, S. B. (2020). ‘Gathering the Most Important Acts and Information from the Archives’ (Caucasian Archaeographic Commission and Archival Work in the Caucasus in the Second Half of the 19th Century). New Past, 2, 44–61. https://doi.org/10.18522/2500-3224-2020-2-44-61 (In Russian).

Rybakov, A. L. (2006). Orientalist in the Caucasus: On the 120th Anniversary of the Death of A. P. Berge (1828–1886). In Caucasian Collection: Vol. 3 (35) (pp. 356–369). Russian Panorama. (In Russian).

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Semevsky, M. I. (1886). Adolph Petrovich Berge. Russian Antiquity, 49(3), 727–744. (In Russian).

Shcherbinin, M. P. (1876). Acts Collected by the Caucasian Archaeographic Commission: Review. Russian Antiquity, 15(1), 225–234. (In Russian).

Sulaberidze, Y. S. (2013). Adolph Petrovich Berge: Researcher of the Caucasus. Clio, 3(75), 97–102. (In Russian).

Tiflis Life. (1888). Caucasus, 96(2). (In Russian).

Tolz, V. (2011). Russia’s Own Orient: The Politics of Identity and Oriental Studies in the Late Imperial and Early Soviet Russia. Oxford University Press.

Torbakov, I. (2001). ‘Shards of a Shattered Imperial Project’: Historical Defeat of the Imperial Project. Ab Imperio, 4, 391–435. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2001.0080 (In Russian).

Venyukov, M. I. (1879). Notes on New Books. Russian Antiquity, 25(8), 747–754. (In Russian).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.