The article differs from the usual scientific articles, since it refers to the genre of the pre-project that is rarely published in journals related to the social sciences. The pre-project contains the results not of the study as a whole, but of its preparatory stage. A thorough study of the hypothesis, scientific problem, methods, research boundaries, as well as the possibility of object transformation and practical applicability are developed before launching a research project and need extensive discussion from colleagues who are not involved in the research. It is important especially if the project claims to be global in scope. This article just offers to discuss the main provisions of the future study of topographic preferences. It is planned to start realization of the project from a study of the topographical preferences of large city residents. As main activities on this stage should be testing the main preliminary installations, improving the tools for collecting materials, building the parameters of the analysis in accordance with the first data received. As a result of this stage, the stage of practical verification of the theory, it is planned to get an idea of the preferences themselves and their motivators, to develop universal basic tools for identifying topographic preferences that are applicable for use in different cultures. The next stage should be the development of tools for studying the topographical preferences of migrants in order to identify the parameters that affect the choice of directions of migration flows. At this stage, it is planned to involve foreign colleagues to test methods, tools and hypotheses about the cross-cultural nature of mental maps and topographic representations. The published pre-project formulates the terminological apparatus of the planned project, indicates the markers of inclusion of toposes in mental maps, as well as factors affecting the configuration of the topographic hierarchy (a complex of topographic preferences).
Abdrakhmanova, T. M. (2017). Local Toponymy: Structural-Semantic and Motivational Analysis. Young Scientist, 14(148), 681–683. (In Russian).
Akhmetova, M. V. (2011). Russian Unofficial Toponymy: Genesis and Usus. Bulletin of the Russian State University of Humanities. Series: Literary Studies. Linguistics. Culturology, 9(71), 228–237. (In Russian).
Alekseevsky, M. D., Akhmetova, M. V., & Lurie, M. L. (2010). Studies of the city. Anthropology Forum, 12, 16–25. (In Russian).
Annuk, E., & Voolaid, P. (2020). Soolisuse esitamine Eesti grafitis ja tänavakunstis [The Representation of Solace in Estonian Graphic Art and Street Art]. Methis Studia humaniora Estonica, 26, 109‑136. https://doi.org/10.7592/methis.v21i26.16913 (In Estonian)
Ansem, N. van, David, L., Eekhout, C. van, Leijnse, M., Mellendijk, S., & Oost, K. (2020). Remembering Urban Trauma: St Petersburg and Nijmegen in the Second World War. Corpus Mundi, 1(2), 122‑159. https://doi.org/10.46539/cmj.v1i2.16
Antze, P. (1996). Telling Stories, Making Selves: Memory and Identity in Multiple Personality Disorder. In P. Antze & M. Lambek (Eds.), Tense past: Cultural essays in trauma and memory (pp. 3–24). Routledge.
Aquilué, I., Lekovic, M., & Ruiz Sánchez, J. (2014). Urban Trauma and Self-organization of the City. Autopoiesis in the Battle of Mogadishu and the Siege of Sarajevo. Urban, (Ejemplar Dedicado a: New Urban Languages. Rethinking Urban Ideology in Post-Ideological Times), 8–9, 63–76.
Arkhipova, A., & Kirzyuk, A. (2020). Dangerous Soviet Things: Urban Legends and Fears in the USSR. New Literary Review. (In Russian).
Auger, M. (2017). Non-Place. Introduction to the Anthropology of Hypermodernity. New Literary Review. https://www.libfox.ru/680712-mark-ozhe-ne-mesta-vvedenie-v-antropologiyu-gipermoderna.html (In Russian).
Bauman, Z. (2008). City of Fears, City of Hopes. Logos, 3(66), 24–53. (In Russian).
Bauman, Z., & Donskis, L. (2019). Ongoing Evil: Living in a World with No Alternatives. Ivan Limbach Publishers. (In Russian).
Bondi, L. (2005). Making connections and thinking through emotions: Between geography and psychotherapy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00183.x
Brodel, F. (2006). Material Civilization, Economy, and Capitalism, 15th and 18th Centuries. Ves Mir. (In Russian).
Bunchuk, T. N. (1998). The role of toponymic legends in the etymology of the toponym. In V. G. Kostomarov (Ed.), General Problems of Teaching Languages: Teaching Russian to Finno-Ugric Audiences: Abstracts of the International Scientific and Methodological Conference (pp. 23–24). Syktyvkar State University. (In Russian).
Cole, J. (2004). Painful Memories: Ritual and the Transformation of Community Trauma. Cult Med Psychiatry, 28, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MEDI.0000018099.85466.c0
Davidson, J., Bondi, L., & Smith, M. (Eds.). (2007). Emotional Geographies. Ashgate.
Etkind, A. (2013). Domestic Colonization. The Imperial Experience of Russia. New Literary Review. (In Russian).
Foucault, M. (2006a). Other spaces. In Intellectuals and Power: Selected Political Articles, Speeches, and Interviews. Part 3 (pp. 191–204). Praksis. (In Russian).
Foucault, M. (1998). Self-care. A History of Sexuality (Vol. 3). Spirit and Literature. (In Russian).
Foucault, M. (2006b). Space, Knowledge, and Power. In Intellectuals and Power: Selected Political Articles, Speeches, and Interviews. Part 3 (pp. 215–236). Praksis. (In Russian).
Frank, A. G., & Gills, B. (Eds.). (1994). The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? Routledge.
Friedmann, J. (1966). Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. MIT Press.
Gorbanevsky, M. V. (1996). Russian Urban Toponymy: Methods of Historical and Cultural Studies and Computer Dictionaries. OLRS. (In Russian).
Grevs, I. M. (1910). To the theory and practice of “excursions” as the scientific study of history in universities. (Trip to Italy with students in 1907). ZhMNP. New Series, XXVIII, 21–64. (In Russian).
Grevs, I. M. (1921). The Monumental City and Historical Excursions. (The Basic Idea of Educational Journeys to Major Centers of Culture). Excursion services, 1, 21–34. (In Russian).
Grews, I. M. (1903). Scientific walks through the historical centers of Italy: I. Essays on Florentine culture. Type-lithography of the Partnership I. Н. Kushnerrev & Co. (In Russian).
Grigorichev, K. V. (2020). The “Wrong” Chinese and the “Captured” City: Challenging Urban Space as the Development of Practices of Interaction with the Other. Journal of Social Policy Research, 18(4), 593–608. (In Russian).
Hägerstrand, T. (1986). Om geografins kärnområde [About the core area of geography]. Svensk Geografisk Årsbok, 62, 38–43. (In Swedish).
Haken, H., & Portugali, J. (2003). The face of the city is its information. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00003-3
Hetherington, K., & Degen, M. (2001). Hauntings. Space and Culture, 10(4), 1–6.
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social-structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049
Hubbard, P., Bartley, B., Fuller, D., & Kitchin, R. (2002). Thinking Geographically: Space, Theory and Contemporary Human Geography. Continuum.
Jiang, B. (2012). The image of the city out of the underlying scaling of city artifacts or locations. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(6), 1552–1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.779503
Johnson, D. R., Feldman, S. C., Lubin, H., & S.M, S. (1995). The therapeutic use of ritual and ceremony in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8(2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490080209
Khimik, V. V. (2000). Poetics of the Low, or Urban Prose as a Cultural Phenomenon. Faculty of Philology, St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian).
Kidron, C. A. (2012). Breaching the wall of traumatic silence: Holocaust survivor and descendant person–object relations and the material transmission of the genocidal past. Journal of Material Culture, 17(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183511432989
Kidron, C. A. (2013). Being There Together: Dark Family Tourism and the Emotive Experience of Copresence in the Holocaust Past. Annals of Tourism Research, 41, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.12.009
Kirschenbaum, L. A. (2006). The Legacy of the Siege of Leningrad, 1941-1995: Myth, Memories, and Monuments. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511882
Kravtsov, N. I., & Lazutin, S. G. (1983). Russian oral folklore. High School. (In Russian).
Kwan, M.-P. (2007). Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion. The Professional Geographer, 59(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00588.x
L’Hoeste, H. (1998). From Mafalda to Boogie: The City and Argentine Humor. In E. Bueno & T. Caesar (Eds.), Imagination Beyond Nation: Latin American Popular Culture (pp. 81–106). University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjp98.7
Lefebvre, A. (2015). Space production. Strelka Press. (In Russian).
Lugones, М. (2003). Pilgramages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing Coalition against Multiple Oppressions. Rowman & Littlefield.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. MIT Press.
Malakhov, V. S. (2020). From Communities to Spaces: Exploring Urban Environmental Change Under the Influence of Migration. Journal of Social Policy Research, 18(4), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2020-18-4-561-576 (In Russian).
Massey, D. (1996). Politics and Space/Time. New Left Review, 196, 65–84.
McQuoid, J., & Dijst, M. (2012). Bringing emotions to time geography: The case of mobilities of poverty. Journal of Transport Geography, 23, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.019
Moisi, D. (2010). The Geopolitics of Emotion. How Cultures of Fear, Humiliation, and Hope Transform the World. Moscow School of Political Studies. (In Russian).
Nicolai, F. V., & Khazina, A. V. (2015). The History of Emotion and the “Affective Turn”: Problems of Dialogue. Dialogue with Time, 50, 97–115. (In Russian).
Nikolayeva, Zh., & Troitskiy, S. (2018). An Introduction to Russian and International Studies of Cultural Exclusion Zones. An Analytical Overview of Recent Concepts. Rivista Di Estetica, 67(LVIII), 3‑19. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.2482
Nora, P. (1984). Les lieux de mémoire. 1: La République. Gallimard.
Nora, P. (1999). France-memory. St. Petersburg University Press. (In Russian).
Ouspensky, L. (1969). Toponymic riddles. Young Guard. (In Russian).
Podyukov, I. A. (2015). Symbolism of toponymic references in folk phraseology. Sociological and Psycholinguistic Studies, 3, 41–43. (In Russian).
Portugali, J. (2011). Complexity, Cognition and the City, Understanding Complex Systems. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19451-1
Ragulina, M. V. (2017). Geopolitics and Geography of Emotions: The Problem of Subjectivity. Society: Politics, Economics, Law, 11, 28–31. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2017.11.6 (In Russian).
Rowland, E. (2014). Emotional geographies of care work in the NHS. Royal Holloway University of London. (Doctoral Thesis.
Schultz, J.-H., & Weisæth, L. (2015). The power of rituals in dealing with traumatic stress symptoms: Cleansing rituals for former child soldiers in Northern Uganda. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 18(10), 822–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2015.1094780
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Techn J, 27, 379–423, 623–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.
Sharipova, O. A. (2012). Unofficial toponyms as a subsystem of the language of the city. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin.. Humanities, 4(1), 203–206. (In Russian).
Skopina, M. V. (2013). The Phenomenon of “Place” and “Non-Place” in the Postindustrial City. MSCU Bulletin, 1, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2013.1.66-71 (In Russian).
Sodaro, A. (2018). Exhibiting Atrocity. Memorial Museums and the Politics of Past Violence. Rutgers University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1v2xskk
Sokolova, V. K. (1972). Types of the East Slavic toponymic legends. In Б. N. Putilov & V. K. Sokolova (Eds.), Slavic Folklore (pp. 202–233). Nauka. (In Russian).
Spelman, E. V. (2008). Repair and the scaffold of memory. In P. E. Steinberg & R. Shields (Eds.), What is a city? The urban after Katrina (pp. 140–154). University of Georgia Press.
Stas, I. (2020). Studies of Urban Identities in Historical Urbanism in Siberia. Quaestio Rossica, 8(5), 1807–1821. (In Russian).
Sukhikh, M. P. (2008). Pseudotoponyms in the poetic picture of the world by D. Revyakin. In D. N. Bagretsov & M. A. Litovskaya (Eds.), Word-Text-Sense: A Collection of Students' Research Papers (Vol. 3, pp. 137–139). Ural State University. (In Russian).
Thien, D. (2005). After or beyond Feeling? A Consideration of Affect and Emotion in Geography. Area, 37(4), 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00643a.x
Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler Series B, 86, 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x
Till, K. E. (2005). The new Berlin: Memory, politics, place. University of Minnesota Press.
Tlostanova, M. (2020). Postcolonial Fate and Decolonial Choice: Post-Socialist Mediation. New Literary Review, 1(161), 66–84. (In Russian).
Troitskaya, A. A. (2020). Marking a Place: the Role of Void Spaces in the Mental Boundaries of a City (on the Example of the Smolenka River Mouth). Journal of Frontier Studies, 4, 344–381. https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v5i4.243 (In Russian).
Troitskiy, S. (2018). The Problem of Terminological Precision in Studies on Cultural Exclusion Zones. Rivista di Estetica, 67(LVIII), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.2772
Troitskiy, S. (2021). Trauma and the Victim Economy. Folklore, 82, 14–28.
Troitsky, S. A. (2015). The Problem of Terminological Accuracy in the Study of Cultural Exclusion Zones. New Literary Review, 133, 66–75. (In Russian).
Troitsky, S. A. (2011). The Image of the “Alien Strong” in the Folk Culture. Veche: Journal of Russian Philosophy and Culture, 22, 224–231. (In Russian).
Troitsky, S. A. (2017). Syntax of loss. Studia Culturae, 2(32), 160–172. (In Russian).
Troitsky, S. A. (2019). Trauma construct as a basis for topographic hierarchy formation. Untouchable Stock, 1(123), 123–131. (In Russian).
Troitsky, S. A., Nikolaeva, Zh. V., & Tsarev, A. O. (2018). Problems of Identity in the Zones of Cultural Alienation of the Urban Environment. Studia Culturae, 3(37), 92–111. (In Russian).
Trube, L. L., & Ponomarenko, G. M. (1969). Naive etymology and folklore in toponymy. In В. F. Barashkov & V. A. Nikonov (Eds.), Onomastics of the Volga Region. Proceedings of the I Volga Region Conference on Onomastics (pp. 182–185). Institute of Linguistics of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical Institute named after I. N. Ulyanov. (In Russian).
Tsarev, A. O. (2019). Urban Space in Russian Hip-Hop: Zones of Alienation and its Overcoming. Untouchable stock, 5, 132–143. (In Russian).
Ulrich, P., & Troitsky, S. (2019). The Complexity of «Borders»: Research Agendas, Terminology and Classification. Journal of Frontier Studies, 4(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-0225-2019-10035 (In Russian).
Voolaid, P. (2012). In graffiti veritas: A Paremic Glance at Graffiti in Tartu. Estonia and Poland: Creativity and Change in Cultural Communication, 1 Jokes and humour, 237–268. https://doi.org/10.7592/EP.1.voolaid
Voolaid, P. (2013). Täägin, järelikult olen olemas. Paröömiline pilguheit Tartu grafitile [I'm talking, therefore I exist. A paroeic glimpse of Tartu graphite]. Mäetagused, 53, 7–38. https://doi.org/10.7592/MT2013.53.voolaid (In Estonian)
Wallerstein, I. (2001). Analysis of World Systems and the Situation in the Modern World. University Book. (In Russian).
Wylie, J. W., & Cebster, C. (2018). Eyeopener: Drawing landscape near and far. In Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (pp. 1–42). https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12267
Zaporozhets, O., & Lavrinets, E. (2008). Dramaturgy of urban fear: Rhetorical tactics and “derelict” things. In N. Milerius & B. Cope (Eds.), P.S. Landscapes: Optics of Urban Research. A collection of scientific papers (pp. 83–103). EGU. (In Russian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.