Creation of «Affiliative Postmemory» about the Epoch of Political Repressions (on the Example of Teenagers - Pupils 9-11 Classes)
pdf (Русский)

Abstract views: 261
PDF Downloads: 73


“affiliative” postmemory
“memory policy”
“memory practice”
era of political repression

How to Cite

1. Зевако Ю. Creation of «Affiliative Postmemory» about the Epoch of Political Repressions (on the Example of Teenagers - Pupils 9-11 Classes) // Journal of Frontier Studies. 2019. № 4.2. C. 390-409.


This article will discuss the problem of working with the memory of the “traumatic” events of the "era of political repression". The author took the concept of “postmemory” M. Hirsch as the methodological basis of the study. Analysis of the concept of M. Hirsch gives an understanding of how a person’s “affiliation” with an event takes place, allows us to analyze the mechanism of transition from a “memory policy” to a “memory practice”. An intermediate link in the transition and reformatting of the “familiative” postmemory into “associative” is the “affiliative” post-memory, based on emotional involvement, emotional experience and co-experience. The purpose of my research was to study how to form an “affiliative” postmemory of the “era of political repression” among pupils of grades 9-11. The main methods are experiment, interviewing, observation, content analysis of students' creative work. As a result of the study the most sensitive topics of the “victim” (person / society) and “executioner” (state) were analyzed. The theme of the executioner was complicated by the experience of two feelings: “guilt” (“I am the victim”) and “shame” (“I am the executioner”) in understanding the events of this era. Also, it was revealed that the usual dichotomy “victim” - “executioner”, “man” - “state” - is a significant simplification and prevents the formation of a more balanced picture about the events of the “era of political repression”. The formation of an “affiliative” postmemory allows adding topics of personal responsibility, personal choice, civic consciousness and others to the conversation about these events.
pdf (Русский)


The order of the Government of the Russian Federation of August 15, 2015 No. 1561-r “On approval of the Concept of state policy to perpetuate the memory of victims of political repression”. Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation, (34), Art. 4930.

Antipov G.A. (2012) From memory to history. Ideas and Ideals, (4), pp. 31-48.

Bogumil S. (2010) Crosses and stones: Solovetsky symbols in the construction of the memory of the Gulag. Emergency reserves, (3). Retrieved from

Zotova O.Yu. (2018) Features of the structure and content of social representations of political repression. Retrieved from

Internet resource "" (all about immersive performances and shows). Retrieved from

Rostovtsev E.A., Sosnitsky D.A. (2014) Directions of research on historical memory in Russia. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 2. History. (2). Retrieved from

Oushakine S.“Shall We Breathe This Pain”? “Shall We Breathe This Pain”. On Trauma, Memory, and Communities // In Serguei Oushakine and Elena Trubina (eds.), Travma: Punkty. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 5-41.

Hirsch M. (2016a) What is post-memory (translation - K. Kharlanova). Retrieved from

Hirsch M. (2016b) “There is a difference between post-memory and the mobilization of patriotic feelings” (interview with A. Lozinskaya and M. Hirsch, October 21, 2016). Retrieved from

Bogumil Z. (2012). Stone, Cross and Mask: Searching for Language of Commemoration of the Gulag in theRussian Federation. Polish Sociological Review, (177), pp. 71-90.

Sneagon T. (2019) Dying in the Soviet Gulag for the Future Glory of Mother Russia? Making «Patriotic» Sense of the Gulag in Present-Day Russia. Cultural and Political Imaginaries in Putin’s Russia, pp. 105-140.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.