Forbidden Mourning. Szolyva (Svaliava) – From Zone of Oblivion to Zone of Remembrance
pdf

Abstract views: 248
Galleys Downloads: 2187

Keywords

Transcarpathia
Szolyva Memorial Park
Hungarian Minority
Forced Labour Camp
Giambattista Vico
Cultural Memory
Collective Memory
Regime Change
Mourning Process
Minority Identity

How to Cite

1. Bódi F. Forbidden Mourning. Szolyva (Svaliava) – From Zone of Oblivion to Zone of Remembrance // Journal of Frontier Studies. 2023. № 2 (8). C. 274-290.

Abstract

From the autumn of 1944, Hungarians in Kárpátalja fell victim to the ferocious atrocities. Tens of thousands of civilians were taken hostage and deported by Soviet authorities to Russian labor camps. Mentioning the victims of “malenky robot” was forbidden, as it was adverse to the interests of the ruling communist elite in Hungary. It was only 45 years later, in 1989, that the process of unearthing the truth began. The Szolyva Memorial Park was established in the 1990s. In this study, we analyze an ideal type: the reconstruction of the collective memory of now minority Hungarians in Kárpátalja is a unique story, yet it can be interpreted on a universal level, that of mankind. From Szolyva’s story, it becomes abundantly clear that preserving collective memory is crucial in any community, especially for minority ethnic groups. Since Vico’s axiom states that a common higher truth reflects what is basically human, the fate of Hungarian communities in Kárpátalja represents themselves on a universal level. Freeing the ways to reconstruct the community’s collective memory had an impact on the process of regaining long-lost freedoms. While older generations finally regained the right to grieve, mourn, and remember their own past, younger generations had the chance to integrate the once-forbidden past into the pillars of their future, hence helping the re-emergence of Hungarian identity and reshaping the framework of the community’s existence from 1990 onwards.

https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v8i2.409
pdf

References

Abruzzi, W. S., Brown, J., Durbin, T. E., Fidler, R. C., Hardesty, D. L., Hinton, P., Hurlich, M. G., Kennedy, J. C., Levine, H. B., Veiga, U. M., Moerman, M., Pelt, F. L., Ross, E. B., Vasulu, T. S., & Winterhalder, B. (1982). Ecological Theory and Ethnic Differentiation Among Human Populations [and Comments and Replies]. Current Anthropology, 23(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/202777

Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996306

Barta, G. (1994). The Emergence of the Principality and its First Crises (1526–1606). In B. Köpeczi, G. Barta, I. Bóna, L. Makkai, Z. Szász, & J. Borus (Eds.), History of Transylvania (pp. 247–300). Akadémiai Kiadó.

Biczó, G. (2004). Asszimilációkutatás – elmélet és gyakorlat. [Research of Assimilation—Theory and practice]. MTA PTI Etnoregionális Kutatóközpont. (In Hungarian).

David, R. A. (1975). The Egyptian Kingdoms. Elsevier Publishing projects SA.

Dupka, G. (1993). Egyetlen bűnük magyarok voltak. Emlékkönyv. A Sztálinizmus Kárpátaljai áldozatairól (1944 – 1946). [Their only sin was their Hungarianness. On the Transcarpathian Victims of Stalinism (1944 – 1946)]. INTERMIX. (In Hungarian).

Dupka, G. (2009). Népünk temetője: Szolyva [Our People’s Cemetery: Szolyva]. Kárpátaljai Magyar Művelődési Intézet. (In Hungarian).

Dupka, G. (2014). A kollektív bűnösség elvének alkalmazása a kárpátaljai magyarokkal és németekkel szemben, a 4. Ukrán Front Katonai Tanácsa határozatainak végrehajtása az NKVD-jelentések tükrében, 1944–1946. [How the principle of collective guilt was carried out against the Hungarian and German populations of Transcarpathia (on the strength of the execution of the decisions of the Military Board of the 4th Ukrainian Front in 1944 – 1946] [Doctoral (PhD) dissertation, Pázmány Péter Catholic University]. https://doi.org/10.15774/PPKE.BTK.2014.014 (In Hungarian)

Fromm, E. (1983). Escape form Freedom. Avon Books.

Gambarota, P. (2017). Giambattista Vico, the Vernacular, and the Foundations of Modern Italy. Irresistible Signs. University of Toronto Press.

Gennep, A. V. (1960). The Rites of Passage. University of Chicago.

Gereben, F. (1999). Identitás, kultúra, kisebbség [Identity, culture, minority]. Osiris-AKM. (In Hungarian).

Gereben, F. (2001). A vajdasági magyarok nemzeti és kulturális identitás [The National and Cultural Identity of Hungarians in Vojvodina]. Kisebbség Kutatás, 10(3), 388-400. (In Hungarian).

Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226774497.001.0001

Higgs, R. (2015). Tolstoy’s Manifesto on the State, Christian Anarchy, and Pacifism. The Independent Review, 19(3), 471–479. JSTOR.

Kahler, F. (2014). Az Igazság Canossa-járása avagy a rendszerváltoztatás és az igazságtétel történetéhez. [The Truth of Road to Canossa or to the history of political regime change and justice.]. Antológia Kiadó. (In Hungarian).

Kárpátalja 1. Évfolyam—Magyar a Magyarért Alapítvány [Transcarpathia Year 1—Hungarian for Hungarians Foundation]. (1990). Magyar a Magyarert. https://www.magyaramagyarert.hu/karpatalja/karpatalja-1-evfolyam?task=document.viewdoc&id=15 (In Hungarian)

Kosáry, D. (1983). Művelődés a XVIII. századi Magyarországon [Culture in Hungary in the 18th century]. Akadémiai Kiadó. (In Hungarian).

Molnár, D. E. (2015). Kárpátaljai magyarok a Szovjetunió hadifogoly- és munkatáboraiban (1944-1953). [Hungarians in Transcarpathia in the prisoner-of-war and labor camps of the Soviet Union (1944-1953)] [Doctoral (PhD) dissertation]. University of Debrecen. (In Hungarian).

Nora, P. (1996). Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past (Vols. 1-Conflicts and Divisions). Columbia University Press.

Smith, A. D. (1991). National Identity. Penguin Books.

Spira, G. (1980). A nemzetiségi kérdés a negyvennyolcas forradalom Magyarországán [The issue of nationality in the Hungary of the Forty-Eighth Revolution]. Kossuth Kiadó. (In Hungarian).

Terdik, Sz., & Demján, Sz. (2020). Mankovits Mihály (Michael Mankovits) festőművész (1785 – 1853) [Mihály Mankovits (Michael Mankovits) painter (1785—1853)]. Magyar a Magyarért Alapítvány. (In Hungarian).

Turner, W. V. (1967). Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage. In The Forest of Symbols (pp. 93–111). Cornell University Press.

Varga, É. M. (2008). Magyar hadifoglyok és internáltak a Szovjetunióban az oroszországi levéltári források türkrében (1941 – 1956) [Hungarian prisoners of war and internees in the Soviet Union in the sources of Russian archives (1941—1956)]. Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. (In Hungarian).

Vico, G. (1979). Az új tudomány. [The New Science]. Akadémiai Kiadó. (In Hungarian).

Vico, G. (2020). The New Science (J. Taylor & C. R. Miner, Trans.). Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt1sgbh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.