The paper intends to explore three archetypes of possible interaction between the agent and the social space in which one's own action is located. In this article, we will talk about modalities endowed with normative significance, that is focused around universal scopes and extra-contextual validities (values). Special attention will be paid to the dimension of the “intersection of social spaces” (the scheme assumes both the permanent dimension of “acting within spaces” and the dynamic dimension of “passing beyond them”), the modalities of exclusion, transition, and recognition are thus presented. Their action is complicated by alternative intersection paths in introdynamic and extradynamic dimensions. The study proposes to represent these modalities in order to further offer scenarios for the development and change of urban social spaces.
Finally, the paper intends to propose a phenomenological interpretation of their possible interaction with reference to some ways of transforming urban spaces, which are typical of the European context.
Barry, B. (2002). Social exclusion, social isolation and the distribution of income. In P. Agulnik, J. Hills, J. Le Grand & D. Piachaud (Eds.), Understanding Social Exclusion (pp. 13-29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Kolesnikova, D., Nikolaeva Zh., Pirni A. & Tsarev A. (2019). Critical review of the materials presented in the international round table “City space: Identity and Philosophy”. Veche. Almanac of Russian Philosophy and Culture, 1, 214-229. (In Russian).
Nikolaeva, Zh. V. & Pirni, A. (2018). Confini e zone di esclusione nella civiltà urbana contemporanea. Spunti per una riflessione interdisciplinare [Borders and exclusion zone in the urban contemporary civilization. Hints towards an interdisciplinary understanding], Cosmopolis. Rivista di filosofia e teoria politica, XV (1-2), Retrieved from: https://www.cosmopolisonline.it/articolo.php?numero= XV122018&id=14
Nikolaeva, Zh. V. (2019). An exception as a rule. Boundaries and exclusion in the history of urban civilization. Abstracts of the conference report. Mechanisms for formation of cultural exclusion and frontier zones – 2019. Conference schedule and materials (pp. 74-75). St. Petersburg: Sociological Institute RAS – Branch Federal Science Sociological Centre RAS.
Pirni, A. (Ed.). (2009). Logiche dell’alterità [Logics of Otherness], Pisa: ETS.
Pirni, A. (2018a). Intergenerational Dwelling: The Right to Transform, the Duty to Preserve, Studia Culturae, 37(3), 137-143. (In Russian).
Pirni, A. (2018b). La sfida della convivenza. Per un’etica interculturale [The Challenge of Living Together. Towards an intercultural ethics], Pisa: ETS.
Pirni, A., Nikolaeva, Zh. V. & Ignatieva, S. (2020). Mutual Recognition: A First Philosophical Dialogue Between Italian and Russian Perspectives, Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, forthcoming.
Simmel, G. (1985). Bridge and Door. Lotus International, 47. 52–56.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.