The Syndrom of Deep Borderland’s Identitites. Contributions for Understanding of Krajina
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

Border
borderland
state of emergency
krajina
Serbs
struggle
fear
Eastern Europe
the philosophy of existence

How to Cite

1. Koprivitsa C. The Syndrom of Deep Borderland’s Identitites. Contributions for Understanding of Krajina // Journal of Frontier Studies. 2019. № 4.2. C. 257-295.

Abstract

In this article, we highlight boundaries between various types of cultural-political entities, whose nature varies according to the features of their respective historical situations. Most attention is devoted to the type of boundaries that are formed in areas where for a long time two communities failed to resolve their dispute, which generates the corresponding type of collective and political identity of the two respective sides. Unlike the case of a non-conflict or moderately strained type of coexistence, the peculiriaty of relationship between two communities creates a special type of identity in the course of long-standing unresolved dispute, so that tha fact of being on the border defines the way of life in the depth of territory.

Such a constellation of a permanent emergency situation prevents for a long time the consolidation of collective identities of the corresponding sides, in the otherwise usual manner between mutually non-hostile communities, which ultimately causes their identitities’ mutation. Communities that possess such unfinished identities, usually located in an area of heightened geopolitical significance, are suitable for instrumental treatment by external, usually imperial powers. The analysis of borderland collective identities was carried out with reference to examples from Southeastern (especially Serbian krajina) and Eastern Europe.

https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-0225-2019-10036
pdf (Русский)

References

Berger, P. & Luckman, T. (1995). Social construction of reality. A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. (E. Rutkevich trans) Moscow: Medium.

Bösch, F. (2012). Entstehung an der Peripherie: Europavorstellungen im 20. In Jahrhundert, F. Bösch et al. (ред.), Europabilder im 20. Jahrhundert. Entstehung an der Peripherie (стр. 7-24), Göttingen: Wallstein.

Davis, M. L. (2018). Fin de siècle: The psychopathology of historical life. New Literary Review, 149 (1), 353-373 (N. Stavrogin trans).

Ekmechiћ, M. (2007). Dougo kreteретe change the class and oraњa. The history of Srba at the New Age (1492–1992) [Long movement from killing to plowing. The history of the Serbs in the new time (1492-1992], Beograd: Factory for ubenike.

Etkind, A., Uffelmann, D. & Kukulin, I. (2012). The internal colonization of Russia: between practice and imagination. In Alexander Etkind et al. (eds.), Inside. The practice of internal colonization in the cultural history of Russia (p. 6-50). Moscow: New literary review.

Guskova, E. Yu. (2001). The history of the Yugoslav crisis (1990-2000). Moscow: Russian Law / Russian National Fund.

Heidegger M. (2003). Being and time. Kharkov: Folio (V.V. Bibikhin trans).

Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. (1997). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical fragments. Moscow - St. Petersburg: Medium - Juventa (M. Kuznetsov trans).

Husserl, Е. (2005). Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1893–1912), Husserliana, Bd. XXXVIII. New York: Springer.

Karabuschenko, P.L. (2016). Elite and Frontier. Journal of Frontier Studies, (2), 92-104.

Khodarkovsky, M. (2012). What Russia “ahead of” Europe, or Russia as a colonial empire, In Alexander Etkind et al. (eds.), Inside. The practice of internal colonization in the cultural history of Russia (p. 105-116). Moscow: New literary review.

Koprivitsa, Ch. D. (2014a). Њegoshev angazhman. Fighting and Smisao in Legov's Kizhevny and Animal Business [Engagement of Negosh. The struggle and meaning in his literary works and in the work of his life; in Serbian]. In Irina Deretiћ (eds.), History of Philology of Philosophy III. Attempt to abstain (p. 310-344). Beograd: Euro Giunti.

Koprivitsa, Ch. D. (2014b). Њegos kao mislilac п spp situation and п identity ’[Negosh as a thinker of the Serbian situation and Serbian identity]. In Miro Vuksanoviћ (ed.), Њegoshev Zbornik Matice srpske 2, Spomenitsa on the two-year-old њegoshevog roђeњa (p. 324-352). Novi Sad: Mother of Srpska.

Koprivitsa, Ch. D. (2016). Montenegrins. Scientific Result, 1 (7), 66-70.

Kopriwitza, Tsch. (2015). Die Identität zwischen Sein und Reflexion. Zur Klärung einer viel umstrittenen Begriffes. In Holger Zaborowski et al. (ред.), Phänomenologische Ontologie des Sozialen (pp. 294-317), Belgrad: Институт за философију и друштвену теорију.

Kopriwitza, Tsch. (2017). Starke Grenzen – weiche Kerne. Eine Besinnung auf das Verhältnis der europäischen Praxis der Grenzziehung und das Phänomen der Identitätsbildung. In Madalina Diaconu/ Bianca Boteva-Richter (ред.), Grenzen im Denken Europas. Wien: New academic press. (рр. 111-133).

Kozelleck, R. (2016). “Space of experience” and “horizon of expectations” are two historical categories. Sociology of Power, 28 (2), 148-173 (A. Kotov and O. Kildyushov trans).

Kraљachi, T. (2017). The Kalaya regime in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1882–1903) [The Kalaya regime in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1882–1903]. Beograd: Catena mundi.

Manan, A.A. (2019). Adam’s Mirror: the Frontier in the Imperial Imagination. Journal of Frontier Studies, (1), 83-101.

Miller, A. (2007). Little Russian Governor General. In M. Dolbilov, A. Miller (eds.), The Western Outskirts of the Russian Empire. New Literature Review. (p. 58-59).

Mogilner, M. (2018). Fin de siècle of the empire: The Island Utopia of Vladimir Jabotinsky. New Literary Review, (1/149), 175-197.

Nygård, S. (2012). Die Moderne übesetzen. Visionen und Gebrauchweisen von Europa in Finland, Europabilder im 20. Jahrhundert. Entstehung an der Peripherie (pp. 195-215). Göttingen: Wallstein.

Panarina, D.S. (2015). Border and frontier as a factor in the development of a region and / or country. History and Present, (1), 15-41.

Ponamarev, E. (2017). Russian Imperial Travelogue. New Literary Review, (2/142), 33-44.

Ponomareva, E.G. (2010). New states in the Balkans. Moscow: MGIMO.

Ranke, L. (2019). Srbiјa and Tursk in the ninth century. Novi Sad: Akademsk kiga (S. Novakovich trans).

Rieber, A. (2004). Changing concepts and designs of the frontier: a comparative historical approach. In Gerasimov, I.V. et al. (Eds.), The New Imperial History of the Post-Soviet Space. Kazan: Center for the Study of Nationalism and Empire.

Samarџiћ, R. (ed.) (1994). History of the People's Communist Party, section III / 1. Beograd: Srpska Kњizhevna a friend.

Schmaus, A. (1971). Zur Frage der Kulturorientierung der Serben im Mittelalter. Gesammelte slavistische und balkanologische Abhandlungen 1 (стр. 272-289), München: R. Trofenik.

Schmaus, A. (1973). Heldentum und Hybris. In Gesammelte slavistische und balkanologische Abhandlungen 2 (стр. 291-302). München: R. Trofenik.

Shemyakin, Y. G. (2016). Russia and Latin America as Civilizations: An Attempt at Comparison. Reflections on the books of VB Zemskova. World of Russia, (1), 154-180.

Sokol, J. (2009). Peripherie und Grenze. In M. T. Vogt et al. (ред.), Peripherie in der Mitte Europas (рр. 51-60). Frankfurt/M. et al: Peter Lang.

Srpska Academy of Science and Sciences [SANU] (1978). Rechnik srpskohvrvatsk kizhevnog and folk Gezika [Dictionary of Serbo-Croatian literary and folk language], volume Х. Beograd.

Stoanchevi, V. (ed.) (1994). History of the People's Communist Party, section V / 1. Beograd: Srpska Kњizhevna a friend.

Yakushenkov, S. N. (2016). Gloomy clouds cover the border - the stern land is enveloped in silence. Journal of Frontier Studies, (4), 7-32.

Yakushenkov, S. N. (2019). In Frontier we trust. Journal of Frontier Studies, (3), 12-59.

Zamyatin, D.N. (2000). Phenomenology of geographical images. New Literature Review, 46, Retrieved from http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2000/46/fenom-pr.html.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.